to be or not to be? to take or not to take?
i say the negative.No,its not fair at all, why should we curtail our dreams by pledging a part of it to another country?
We have the resources,we have everything,i.e. everything except the technology.
Its time ,we think of plans to invent our own,then take some other country.Gone are the times,when we were dependent on others,we have reached a stage,where should take care of our selves.This independence day will be remembered for this reason more than anything else,i.e. the INDO-U.S. nuke deal.
what ever the thing says i am not interested,nor in reading long essays about the pros and cons,rather i am bothered about what effects it will have.
Remember how the British and other Europeans entered the country? i think this will lead to a similar situation,they will start interfering in all our problems.
I seriously think that its time India adopted a more swadeshi way.It is our nation and our people who are suffering from the supposedly "backwardness" .We also have to eradicate poverty and other social degrading factors.Again the aam admi is directly affected by all decisions.We can use what we have and develop and build.all we need to do is,just see it.
If we can open our society more,in ways which would allow people to come up and take up the challenge.One important factor is the corruption.this doesn't have any permanent solution nor will there ever be one.We will have to find a way,to reduce this, to a level where it is feasible for people to come up with our own ideas.
It is time we begin.Let us work and churn our own power and let us not become exposed.